Overall, the guide follows the approach that the use of DNNs in dispute resolution should be the exception rather than the norm, giving both time and money to workers to check whether they are willing to agree. This is an abandonment of the current practice of many employers who submit concordat agreements with a standard confidentiality clause, who often require them to be signed in a short period of time and make a minimal contribution to lawyers` fees. Settlement of disputes with workers. Confidentiality agreements that prevent workers from discussing discriminatory acts are generally included in conciliation agreements and Acas conciliation agreements. In some cases, this will not be legal, but in any case, the EHRC guidelines are good practice: the guidelines contain many recommendations for good practice and some specific points need to be taken into consideration: employers will also want to seek further regulatory guidance for their lawyers, which will be published in due course by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Advice from the Law Society and any legislation that may be enacted in due course as a result of the government`s recent consultation on the use and misuse of NSDAs and regulatory options. Illegal confidentiality agreements. The guidelines also cover the types of confidentiality agreements that cannot be applied. These include those that prevent disclosures protected under whistleblowing legislation, discussions about criminal activities or activities prescribed by law, such as testimony or notification to a supervisory authority. The guidelines on good practice state that the text of the conciliation agreement should make it clear to the worker that he will not be prevented from doing these things. Confidentiality agreements are sometimes referred to as confidentiality clauses, confidentiality agreements (INAs), or throttle clauses. These guidelines refer to any form of agreement or contract that provides that certain types of information will not be discussed or disclosed.
. . .